@article {10490, title = {Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 Monitoring in PICU: A Multicenter Study on Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome.}, journal = {Pediatr Crit Care Med}, volume = {18}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 02}, pages = {e86-e91}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: Withdrawal syndrome is an adverse reaction of analgesic and sedative therapy, with a reported occurrence rate between 17\% and 57\% in critically ill children. Although some factors related to the development of withdrawal syndrome have been identified, there is weak evidence for the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic strategies. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of withdrawal syndrome in Italian PICUs, using a validated instrument. We also analyzed differences in patient characteristics, analgesic and sedative treatment, and patients{\textquoteright} outcome between patients with and without withdrawal syndrome.

DESIGN: Observational multicenter prospective study.

SETTING: Eight Italian PICUs belonging to the national PICU network Italian PICU network.

PATIENTS: One hundred thirteen patients, less than 18 years old, mechanically ventilated and treated with analgesic and sedative therapy for five or more days. They were admitted in PICU from November 2012 to May 2014.

INTERVENTIONS: Symptoms of withdrawal syndrome were monitored with Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 scale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The occurrence rate of withdrawal syndrome was 64.6\%. The following variables were significantly different between the patients who developed withdrawal syndrome and those who did not: type, duration, and cumulative dose of analgesic therapy; duration and cumulative dose of sedative therapy; clinical team judgment about analgesia and sedation{\textquoteright}s difficulty; and duration of analgesic weaning, mechanical ventilation, and PICU stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients receiving morphine as their primary analgesic were 83\% less likely to develop withdrawal syndrome than those receiving fentanyl or remifentanil.

CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal syndrome was frequent in PICU patients, and patients with withdrawal syndrome had prolonged hospital treatment. We suggest adopting the lowest effective dose of analgesic and sedative drugs and frequent reevaluation of the need for continued use. Further studies are necessary to define common preventive and therapeutic strategies.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Analgesics, Child, Child, Preschool, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Iatrogenic Disease, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Italy, Logistic Models, Male, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome}, issn = {1529-7535}, doi = {10.1097/PCC.0000000000001054}, author = {Amigoni, Angela and Mondardini, Maria Cristina and Vittadello, Ilaria and Zaglia, Federico and Rossetti, Emanuele and Vitale, Francesca and Ferrario, Stefania and Savron, Fabio and Coffaro, Giancarlo and Brugnaro, Luca and Amato, Roberta and Wolfler, Andrea and Franck, Linda S} }