@article {10513, title = {Does the Application of Heat Gel Pack After Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic Cream Improve Venipuncture or Intravenous Cannulation Success Rate in Children? A Randomized Control Trial.}, journal = {Pediatr Emerg Care}, volume = {34}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {e24-e27}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: Needle-related procedures are the most common sources of pain for children in the hospital setting. The most used topical anesthetic, eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream, may cause transient vasoconstriction. It has been postulated that this vasoconstriction may decrease vein visualization. The application of heat gel pack after removal of EMLA cream in the site of venipuncture counteracts the vasoconstriction, improving vein visualization. We assessed using a prospective randomized controlled trial whether the application of heat gel pack increases the needle procedure success rate. The primary study outcome was procedural success rate at the first attempt.

METHODS: The study enrolled 400 children, 200 of whom applied heat gel pack after removing EMLA (treatment group) and 200 did not (control group). Procedural success rate at the first attempt, vein perception before procedure, procedural pain, and adverse events were recorded in both groups.

RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the procedures were successful at the first attempt in the treatment group and 89\% in the control group (P = 0.876). Vein perception was not significantly different in the 2 groups (P = 0.081). Pain score after the procedure was similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the application of heat gel pack after removal of EMLA cream does not improve venipuncture or intravenous cannulation success rate.

}, keywords = {Anesthetics, Local, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Lidocaine, Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination, Male, Pain, Pain Management, Phlebotomy, Prilocaine, Prospective Studies}, issn = {1535-1815}, doi = {10.1097/PEC.0000000000001248}, author = {Schreiber, Silvana and Cozzi, Giorgio and Patti, Giuseppa and Taddio, Andrea and Montico, Marcella and Pierobon, Chiara and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {10536, title = {First-time success with needle procedures was higher with a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch than an eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine cream.}, journal = {Acta Paediatr}, volume = {106}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May}, pages = {773-778}, abstract = {

AIM: More than 50\% of children report apian during venepuncture or intravenous cannulation and using local anaesthetics before needle procedures can lead to different success rates. This study examined how many needle procedures were successful at the first attempt when children received either a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch or an eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) cream.

METHODS: We conducted this multicentre randomised controlled trial at three tertiary-level children{\textquoteright}s hospitals in Italy in 2015. Children aged three to 10 years were enrolled in an emergency department, paediatric day hospital and paediatric ward and randomly allocated to receive a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch or EMLA cream. The primary outcome was the success rate at the first attempt.

RESULTS: The analysis included 172 children who received a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch and 167 who received an EMLA cream. The needle procedure was successful at the first attempt in 158 children (92.4\%) who received the warm patch and in 142 children (85.0\%) who received the cream (p = 0.03). The pain scores were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION: This study showed that the first-time needle procedure success was 7.4\% higher in children receiving a warm lidocaine and tetracaine patch than EMLA cream.

}, keywords = {Anesthetics, Local, Catheterization, Peripheral, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Lidocaine, Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination, Male, Pain, Phlebotomy, Prilocaine, Tetracaine}, issn = {1651-2227}, doi = {10.1111/apa.13764}, author = {Cozzi, Giorgio and Borrometi, Fabio and Benini, Franca and Neri, Elena and Rusalen, Francesca and Celentano, Loredana and Zanon, Davide and Schreiber, Silvana and Ronfani, Luca and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {8042, title = {Analgesia by cooling vibration during venipuncture in children with cognitive impairment.}, journal = {Acta Paediatr}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Sep 24}, abstract = {

AIM: Children with cognitive impairment experience pain more frequently than healthy children and are more likely to require venipuncture or intravenous cannulation for various procedures. They are frequently unable to report pain and often receive poor pain assessment and management. This study assessed the effectiveness of physical analgesia during vascular access in children with cognitive impairments.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomised controlled study at a tertiary-level children{\textquoteright}s hospital in Italy from April to May 2015 to assess whether a cooling vibration device called Buzzy decreased pain during venipuncture and intravenous cannulation in children with cognitive impairment. None of the children had verbal skills and the main cognitive impairments were cerebral palsy, epileptic encephalopathy and genetic syndromes.

RESULTS: We tested 70 children with a median age of nine years: 34 in the Buzzy group and 36 in the no-intervention group. Parents were trained in the use of the Noncommunicating Children{\textquoteright}s Pain Checklist - postoperative version scale, and they reported no or mild procedural pain in 32 cases (91.4\%) in the Buzzy group and in 22 cases (61.1\%) in the no-intervention group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION: Cooling vibration analgesia during vascular access reduced pain in children with cognitive impairment.

}, issn = {1651-2227}, doi = {10.1111/apa.13224}, author = {Schreiber, Silvana and Cozzi, Giorgio and Rutigliano, Rosaria and Assandro, Paola and Tubaro, Martina and Cortellazzo Wiel, Luisa and Ronfani, Luca and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {8082, title = {Nasal irrigation with saline solution significantly improves oxygen saturation in infants with bronchiolitis.}, journal = {Acta Paediatr}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov 26}, abstract = {

AIM: Published guidelines do not recommend nasal irrigation in bronchiolitis, but it is common practice in Italy, despite a lack of data on its benefits or adverse effects. This single-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial compared nasal irrigation using either isotonic 0.9\% sodium chloride or hypertonic 3\% sodium chloride with simple supportive care in infants with bronchiolitis.

METHOD: We randomly assigned 133 Infants up one year of age, who were admitted to the emergency department with bronchiolitis and an oxygen saturation (SpO2) of between 88-94\%, to the isotonic (n=47), hypertonic (n=44) or standard care (n=42) groups. Variations in SpO2 and the wheeze, air exchange, respiratory rate, muscle use (WARM) respiratory distress score were recorded at zero, five, 15, 20 and 50 minutes.

RESULTS: Five minutes after the intervention, the median SpO2 value (95\%) in the isotonic group was higher than both the hypertonic (94\%) and the standard care (93\%) groups. The differences between the isotonic and standard treatment groups were statistically significant at each time point, while the hypertonic group only reached significantly higher values after 50 minutes. However, the WARM score did not improve.

CONCLUSION: A single nasal irrigation with saline solution significantly improved oxygen saturation in infants with bronchiolitis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

}, issn = {1651-2227}, doi = {10.1111/apa.13282}, author = {Schreiber, Silvana and Ronfani, Luca and Ghirardo, Sergio and Minen, Federico and Taddio, Andrea and Jaber, Mohamad and Rizzello, Elisa and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {7763, title = {Normal saline flushes performed once daily maintain peripheral intravenous catheter patency: a randomised controlled trial.}, journal = {Arch Dis Child}, volume = {100}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jul}, pages = {700-3}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence supports the use of normal saline flushes in place of heparin to maintain the patency of peripheral intravenous locks (IVLs); however, there are no data regarding the recommended flush frequency.

STUDY DESIGN: This was an open, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Children with IVLs, aged 1-17 years, were randomly assigned to receive saline flushing every 12 h (group A) or every 24 h (group B). The main outcome was the maintenance of catheter patency.

RESULTS: Four hundred patients were randomised; 198 subjects were analysed in the 12 h group and 199 in the 24 h group (three patients were lost at follow-up). Occlusion occurred in 15 children (7.6\%) in group A versus 9 (4.5\%) in group B (p=0.21). The difference in catheter patency was +3.1\% in favour of the 24 h group (95\% CI -1.6\% to 7.7\%), showing the non-inferiority of the 24 h procedure (the non-inferiority margin was set at -4\%). Catheter-related complications were not different between the two groups (12.1\% in group A vs 9.5\% in group B; p=0.42).

CONCLUSIONS: A flushing procedure with one flush per day allows maintenance of catheter patency without an increase in catheter-related complications. We propose a simplification of the flushing procedure with only one flush per day, thereby reducing costs (materials use and nursing time), labour and unnecessary manipulation of the catheters which can cause distress in younger children and their parents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered in the international database ClinicalTrial.gov under registration number NCT02221024.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Catheterization, Peripheral, Catheters, Indwelling, Child, Child, Preschool, Equipment Failure, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Risk Assessment, Sodium Chloride, Therapeutic Irrigation}, issn = {1468-2044}, doi = {10.1136/archdischild-2014-307478}, author = {Schreiber, Silvana and Zanchi, Chiara and Ronfani, Luca and Delise, Anna and Corbelli, Alessandra and Bortoluzzi, Rosamaria and Taddio, Andrea and Barbi, Egidio} }