@article {10513, title = {Does the Application of Heat Gel Pack After Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic Cream Improve Venipuncture or Intravenous Cannulation Success Rate in Children? A Randomized Control Trial.}, journal = {Pediatr Emerg Care}, volume = {34}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {e24-e27}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: Needle-related procedures are the most common sources of pain for children in the hospital setting. The most used topical anesthetic, eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream, may cause transient vasoconstriction. It has been postulated that this vasoconstriction may decrease vein visualization. The application of heat gel pack after removal of EMLA cream in the site of venipuncture counteracts the vasoconstriction, improving vein visualization. We assessed using a prospective randomized controlled trial whether the application of heat gel pack increases the needle procedure success rate. The primary study outcome was procedural success rate at the first attempt.

METHODS: The study enrolled 400 children, 200 of whom applied heat gel pack after removing EMLA (treatment group) and 200 did not (control group). Procedural success rate at the first attempt, vein perception before procedure, procedural pain, and adverse events were recorded in both groups.

RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the procedures were successful at the first attempt in the treatment group and 89\% in the control group (P = 0.876). Vein perception was not significantly different in the 2 groups (P = 0.081). Pain score after the procedure was similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the application of heat gel pack after removal of EMLA cream does not improve venipuncture or intravenous cannulation success rate.

}, keywords = {Anesthetics, Local, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Lidocaine, Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination, Male, Pain, Pain Management, Phlebotomy, Prilocaine, Prospective Studies}, issn = {1535-1815}, doi = {10.1097/PEC.0000000000001248}, author = {Schreiber, Silvana and Cozzi, Giorgio and Patti, Giuseppa and Taddio, Andrea and Montico, Marcella and Pierobon, Chiara and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {7780, title = {Different presentations of mevalonate kinase deficiency: a case series.}, journal = {Clin Exp Rheumatol}, volume = {33}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 May-Jun}, pages = {437-42}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to raise awareness among paediatricians and physicians about this often misunderstood condition.

METHODS: We discussed the clinical profiles associated with late or wrong diagnosis of mevalonate kinase deficency (MKD) in a single centre case series.

RESULTS: We analysed the most common challenges and pitfalls that a clinician might face during the diagnostic process. Five main clinical profiles were characterised.

CONCLUSIONS: We propose a new perspective on MKD, suggesting that the presentation of this disease can vary from patient to patient.

}, keywords = {Age Factors, Bacterial Infections, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Infant, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Male, Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Sepsis, Vasculitis, Young Adult}, issn = {0392-856X}, author = {De Pieri, Carlo and Taddio, Andrea and Insalaco, Antonella and Barbi, Egidio and Lepore, Loredana and Ventura, Alessandro and Tommasini, Alberto} } @article {3564, title = {Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for hand bony fractures in paediatric patients.}, journal = {Arch Dis Child}, volume = {99}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Dec}, pages = {1087-90}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: Hand fractures are common in childhood, and radiography is the standard diagnostic procedure. US has been used to evaluate bone injuries, mainly in adults for long-bone trauma; there are only a few studies about hand fractures in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and confirm the safety and applicability of the US diagnostic procedure in comparison to X-ray diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study involved a convenience sample of young patients (between 2 and 17 years old) who were taken to the emergency department due to hand trauma. After clinical assessment, patients with a suspected hand fracture first underwent X-ray, and subsequently US examination by two different operators; a radiologist experienced in US and a trained emergency physician in "double-blind" fashion. US and radiographic findings were then compared, and sensitivity as well as specificity was calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were enrolled in the study. Seventy-nine fractures of phalanges or metacarpals were detected by standard radiography. When US imaging was performed by an expert radiologist, 72 fractures were detected with sensitivity and a specificity of 91.1\% and 97.6\%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were found to be (respectively) 91.5\% and 96.8\% when US was performed by the ED physicians.

CONCLUSIONS: US imaging showed excellent sensitivity and specificity results in the diagnosis of hand fractures in children. The study also showed a great agreement between the results of the US carried out by the senior radiologist and those carried out by the paediatric emergency physician, suggesting that US can be performed by an ED physician, allowing a rapid and accurate evaluation in ED and could become the first diagnostic approach whenever a hand fracture is suspected.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Double-Blind Method, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Fractures, Bone, Hand Bones, Humans, Italy, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity}, issn = {1468-2044}, doi = {10.1136/archdischild-2013-305678}, author = {Neri, Elena and Barbi, Egidio and Rabach, Ingrid and Zanchi, Chiara and Norbedo, Stefania and Ronfani, Luca and Guastalla, Veronica and Ventura, Alessandro and Guastalla, Pierpaolo} } @article {3500, title = {Doing without codeine: why and what are the alternatives?}, journal = {Ital J Pediatr}, volume = {40}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {16}, abstract = {

Codeine is a mild opioid widely used as an analgesic in various age groups, including various pediatric settings. It is a prodrug that owes its analgesic effect almost entirely to the principal metabolite: morphine. The genetic polymorphisms can contribute to making the pharmacokinetics of codeine hard to predict and this it is particularly important in the pediatric population because infants and children have greater susceptibility to the side-effects of morphine. In recent years there have been several reports in the literature on the risks relating to the use of codeine. In August 2012, the American Food and Drugs Administration began to revise its recommendations for the safe use of codeine and in February 2013, established that codeine should not be used for postoperative pain control in children undergoing adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy and did restrict the use of this drug in the pediatric population. In June 2013, the European Medicine Agency opted the same decision. In July 2013, the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco prohibit the use of medicines containing codeine for patients under 12~years old and recommended a limited use of the drug, in many other situations. Complying with these recommendations naturally means changing habits and treatment strategies well established in pediatric practice, but other drugs, tools and techniques available enable us to continue to assure an adequate pain control in pediatric patients, irrespective of their age and situation. The article proposes same alternatives of pain control drugs.

}, keywords = {Acetaminophen, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Analgesics, Opioid, Child, Codeine, Humans, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Tonsillectomy}, issn = {1824-7288}, doi = {10.1186/1824-7288-40-16}, author = {Benini, Franca and Barbi, Egidio} } @article {1935, title = {The dietary paradox in food allergy: yesterday{\textquoteright}s mistakes, today{\textquoteright}s evidence and lessons for tomorrow.}, journal = {Curr Pharm Des}, volume = {18}, year = {2012}, month = {2012}, pages = {5782-7}, abstract = {

During the last decades the prevalence of food allergy has significantly increased among children and antigen avoidance still remains the standard care for the management of this condition. Most reactions are IgE-mediated with a high risk of anaphylaxis requiring emergency medications in case of inadvertent ingestion. Recent studies showed that continuous administration of the offending food, rather than an elimination diet, could promote the development and maintenance of oral tolerance. Indeed, intestinal transit of food proteins and their interaction with gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) is the essential prerequisite for oral tolerance. On the contrary, low-dose cutaneous exposure to environmental foods in children with atopic dermatitis and altered skin barrier facilitates allergic sensitization. The timing and the amount of cutaneous and oral exposure determine whether a child will have allergy or tolerance. Furthermore, previous preventive strategies such as the elimination diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding, prolonged exclusive breastfeeding and delayed weaning to solid foods did not succeed in preventing the development of food allergy. On the other hand, there could be an early narrow window of immunological opportunity to expose children to allergenic foods and induce natural tolerance. Finally, the gradual exposure to the offending food through special protocols of specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) may be a promising approach to a proactive treatment of food allergy.

}, keywords = {Anaphylaxis, Antigens, Breast Feeding, Child, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Food Hypersensitivity, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Pregnancy, Time Factors}, issn = {1873-4286}, author = {Badina, Laura and Barbi, Egidio and Berti, Irene and Radillo, Oriano and Matarazzo, Lorenza and Ventura, Alessandro and Longo, Giorgio} }