@article {10517, title = {Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.}, journal = {Cochrane Database Syst Rev}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 06 06}, pages = {CD008991}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is a well-known surgical procedure carried out during pregnancy. It involves positioning of a suture (stitch) around the neck of the womb (cervix), aiming to give mechanical support to the cervix and thereby reduce risk of preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of this procedure remains controversial. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the use of cervical stitch in singleton pregnancy at high risk of pregnancy loss based on woman{\textquoteright}s history and/or ultrasound finding of {\textquoteright}short cervix{\textquoteright} and/or physical exam improves subsequent obstetric care and fetal outcome.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth{\textquoteright}s Trials Register (30 June 2016) and reference lists of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised trials of cervical suturing in singleton pregnancies. Cervical stitch was carried out when the pregnancy was considered to be of sufficiently high risk due to a woman{\textquoteright}s history, a finding of short cervix on ultrasound or other indication determined by physical exam. We included any study that compared cerclage with either no treatment or any alternative intervention. We planned to include cluster-randomised studies but not cross-over trials. We excluded quasi-randomised studies. We included studies reported in abstract form only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We resolved discrepancies by discussion. Data were checked for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS: This updated review includes a total of 15 trials (3490 women); three trials were added for this update (152 women). Cerclage versus no cerclageOverall, cerclage probably leads to a reduced risk of perinatal death when compared with no cerclage, although the confidence interval (CI) crosses the line of no effect (RR 0.82, 95\% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 10 studies, 2927 women; moderate quality evidence). Considering stillbirths and neonatal deaths separately reduced the numbers of events and sample size. Although the relative effect of cerclage is similar, estimates were less reliable with fewer data and assessed as of low quality (stillbirths RR 0.89, 95\% CI 0.45 to 1.75; 5 studies, 1803 women; low quality evidence; neonatal deaths before discharge RR 0.85, 95\% CI 0.53 to 1.39; 6 studies, 1714 women; low quality evidence). Serious neonatal morbidity was similar with and without cerclage (RR 0.80, 95\% CI 0.55 to 1.18; 6 studies, 883 women; low-quality evidence). Pregnant women with and without cerclage were equally likely to have a baby discharged home healthy (RR 1.02, 95\% CI 0.97 to 1.06; 4 studies, 657 women; moderate quality evidence).Pregnant women with cerclage were less likely to have preterm births compared to controls before 37, 34 (average RR 0.77, 95\% CI 0.66 to 0.89; 9 studies, 2415 women; high quality evidence) and 28 completed weeks of gestation.Five subgroups based on clinical indication provided data for analysis (history-indicated; short cervix based on one-off ultrasound in high risk women; short cervix found by serial scans in high risk women; physical exam-indicated; and short cervix found on scan in low risk or mixed populations). There were too few trials in these clinical subgroups to make meaningful conclusions and no evidence of differential effects. Cerclage versus progesteroneTwo trials (129 women) compared cerclage to prevention with vaginal progesterone in high risk women with short cervix on ultrasound; these trials were too small to detect reliable, clinically important differences for any review outcome. One included trial compared cerclage with intramuscular progesterone (75 women) which lacked power to detect group differences. History indicated cerclage versus ultrasound indicated cerclageEvidence from two trials (344 women) was too limited to establish differences for clinically important outcomes.

AUTHORS{\textquoteright} CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cerclage reduces the risk of preterm birth in women at high-risk of preterm birth and probably reduces risk of perinatal deaths. There was no evidence of any differential effect of cerclage based on previous obstetric history or short cervix indications, but data were limited for all clinical groups. The question of whether cerclage is more or less effective than other preventative treatments, particularly vaginal progesterone, remains unanswered.

}, keywords = {Administration, Intravaginal, Cerclage, Cervical, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Perinatal Death, Pregnancy, Premature Birth, Progesterone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stillbirth, Suture Techniques}, issn = {1469-493X}, doi = {10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3}, author = {Alfirevic, Zarko and Stampalija, Tamara and Medley, Nancy} } @article {8482, title = {A Case of Prenatal Neurocytoma Associated With ATR-16 Syndrome.}, journal = {J Ultrasound Med}, volume = {35}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Jun}, pages = {1359-61}, issn = {1550-9613}, doi = {10.7863/ultra.15.07045}, author = {Quadrifoglio, Mariachiara and Faletra, Flavio and Bussani, Rossana and Pecile, Vanna and Zennaro, Floriana and Grasso, Alessandra and Zandon{\`a}, Lorenzo and Alberico, Salvatore and Stampalija, Tamara} }