@article {10804, title = {Intranasal dexmedetomidine, as midazolam-sparing drug, for MRI in preterm neonates.}, journal = {Paediatr Anaesth}, volume = {28}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 08}, pages = {747-748}, issn = {1460-9592}, doi = {10.1111/pan.13454}, author = {Bua, Jenny and Massaro, Marta and Cossovel, Francesca and Monasta, Lorenzo and Brovedani, Pierpaolo and Cozzi, Giorgio and Barbi, Egidio and Demarini, Sergio and Travan, Laura} } @article {3572, title = {A comparison of three scales for measuring pain in children with cognitive impairment.}, journal = {Acta Paediatr}, volume = {103}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Nov}, pages = {e495-500}, abstract = {

AIM: Pain is a neglected problem in children with cognitive impairments, and few studies compare the clinical use of specific pain scales. We compared the Non-Communicating Children{\textquoteright}s Pain Checklist Postoperative Version (NCCPC-PV), the Echelle Douleur Enfant San Salvador (DESS) and the Children{\textquoteright}s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS). The first two were developed for children with cognitive impairment, and the third is a more general pain scale.

METHODS: Two external observers and the child{\textquoteright}s caregiver assessed 40 children with cognitive impairment for pain levels. We assessed inter-rater agreement, correlation, dependence on knowledge of the child{\textquoteright}s behaviour, simplicity and adequacy in pain rating according to the caregiver for all three scales.

RESULTS: The correlation between the NCCPC-PV and the DESS was strong (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.76) and better than between each scale and the CHEOPS. Although the DESS showed better inter-rater agreement, it was more dependent on familiarity with the child and was judged more difficult to use by all observers. The NCCPC-PV was the easiest use and the most appropriate for rating the child{\textquoteright}s pain.

CONCLUSION: The NCCPC-PV was the easiest to use for pain assessment in cognitively impaired children and should be adopted in clinical settings.

}, issn = {1651-2227}, doi = {10.1111/apa.12748}, author = {Massaro, Marta and Ronfani, Luca and Ferrara, Giovanna and Badina, Laura and Giorgi, Rita and D{\textquoteright}Osualdo, Flavio and Taddio, Andrea and Barbi, Egidio} }