@article {8508, title = {Efficacy of ketamine in refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children: a protocol for a sequential design, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-profit trial (KETASER01).}, journal = {BMJ Open}, volume = {6}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, pages = {e011565}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency. SE lasting longer than 120 min and not responding to first-line and second-line antiepileptic drugs is defined as {\textquoteright}refractory{\textquoteright} (RCSE) and requires intensive care unit treatment. There is currently neither evidence nor consensus to guide either the optimal choice of therapy or treatment goals for RCSE, which is generally treated with coma induction using conventional anaesthetics (high dose midazolam, thiopental and/or propofol). Increasing evidence indicates that ketamine (KE), a strong N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptor antagonist, may be effective in treating RCSE. We hypothesised that intravenous KE is more efficacious and safer than conventional anaesthetics in treating RCSE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-profit, sequentially designed study will be conducted to assess the efficacy of KE compared with conventional anaesthetics in the treatment of RCSE in children. 10 Italian centres/hospitals are involved in enrolling 57 patients aged 1 month to 18 years with RCSE. Primary outcome is the resolution of SE up to 24 hours after withdrawal of therapy and is updated for each patient treated according to the sequential method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethical approval from the Tuscan Paediatric Ethics Committee (12/2015). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02431663; Pre-results.

}, issn = {2044-6055}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011565}, author = {Rosati, Anna and Ilvento, Lucrezia and L{\textquoteright}Erario, Manuela and De Masi, Salvatore and Biggeri, Annibale and Fabbro, Giancarlo and Bianchi, Roberto and Stoppa, Francesca and Fusco, Lucia and Pulitan{\`o}, Silvia and Battaglia, Domenica and Pettenazzo, Andrea and Sartori, Stefano and Biban, Paolo and Fontana, Elena and Cesaroni, Elisabetta and Mora, Donatella and Costa, Paola and Meleleo, Rosanna and Vittorini, Roberta and Conio, Alessandra and Wolfler, Andrea and Mastrangelo, Massimo and Mondardini, Maria Cristina and Franzoni, Emilio and McGreevy, Kathleen S and Di Simone, Lorena and Pugi, Alessandra and Mirabile, Lorenzo and Vigevano, Federico and Guerrini, Renzo} } @article {3608, title = {Single-day trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia in children with cancer.}, journal = {J Pediatr}, volume = {164}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Feb}, pages = {389-92.e1}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simplified, 1-day/week regimen of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is sufficient to prevent Pneumocystis (jirovecii [carinii]) pneumonia (PCP). Current recommended regimens for prophylaxis against PCP range from daily administration to 3 consecutive days per week dosing.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective survey of the regimens adopted for the PCP prophylaxis in all patients treated for childhood cancer at pediatric hematology-oncology centers of the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica.

RESULTS: The 20 centers participating in the study reported a total of 2466 patients, including 1093 with solid tumor and 1373 with leukemia/lymphoma (or primary immunodeficiency; n = 2). Of these patients, 1371 (55.6\%) received the 3-day/week prophylaxis regimen, 406 (16.5\%) received the 2-day/week regimen, and 689 (27.9\%), including 439 with leukemia/lymphoma, received the 1-day/week regimen. Overall, only 2 cases of PCP (0.08\%) were reported, both in the 2-day/week group. By intention to treat, the cumulative incidence of PCP at 3 years was 0.09\% overall (95\% CI, 0.00-0.40\%) and 0.51\% for the 2-day/week group (95\% CI, 0.10\%-2.00\%). Remarkably, both patients who failed had withdrawn from prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION: A single-day course of prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole may be sufficient to prevent PCP in children with cancer undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. This simplified strategy might have implications for the emerging need for PCP prophylaxis in other patients subjected to the increased use of biological and nonbiological agents that induce higher levels of immune suppression, such as those with rheumatic diseases.

}, keywords = {Anti-Infective Agents, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Follow-Up Studies, Hematologic Neoplasms, Humans, Incidence, Italy, Pneumocystis carinii, Pneumonia, Pneumocystis, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination}, issn = {1097-6833}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.021}, author = {Caselli, D{\'e}sir{\'e}e and Petris, Maria Grazia and Rondelli, Roberto and Carraro, Francesca and Colombini, Antonella and Muggeo, Paola and Ziino, Ottavio and Melchionda, Fraia and Russo, Giovanna and Pierani, Paolo and Soncini, Elena and DeSantis, Raffaella and Zanazzo, Giulio and Barone, Angelica and Cesaro, Simone and Cellini, Monica and Mura, Rossella and Milano, Giuseppe M and Meazza, Cristina and Cicalese, Maria P and Tropia, Serena and De Masi, Salvatore and Castagnola, Elio and Aric{\`o}, Maurizio} }