@article {10424, title = {Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-life Experience from the SIGENP-IBD Registry.}, journal = {J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr}, volume = {66}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jun}, pages = {920-925}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) previously treated with infliximab (IFX).

METHODS: Retrospective study including children with UC from a national registry who received ADA therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of corticosteroid-free remission at week 52. Secondary outcomes were the rate of sustained clinical remission, primary nonresponse, and loss of response at weeks 12, 30, and 52 and rate of mucosal healing and side effects at week 52.

RESULTS: Thirty-two children received ADA (median age 10ā€Š{\textpm}ā€Š4 years). Median disease duration before ADA therapy was 27 months. All patients received previous IFX (43\% intolerant, 50\% nonresponders [37.5\% primary, 42.5\% secondary nonresponders], 6.7\% positive anti-IFX antibodies). Fifty-two weeks after ADA initiation, 13 patients (41\%) were in corticosteroid-free remission. Mucosal healing occurred in 9 patients (28\%) at 52 weeks. The cumulative probability of a clinical relapse-free course was 69\%, 59\%, and 53\% at 12, 30, and 52 weeks, respectively. Ten patients (31\%) had a primary failure and 5 (15\%) a loss of response to ADA. No significant differences in efficacy were reported between not-responders and intolerant to IFX (Pā€Š=ā€Š1.0). Overall, 19 patient (59\%) maintained ADA during 52-week follow-up. Seven patients (22\%) experienced an adverse event, no serious side effects were observed and none resulted in ADA discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, ADA seems to be effective in children with UC, allowing to recover a significant percentage of patients intolerant or not-responding to IFX. The safety profile was good.

}, issn = {1536-4801}, doi = {10.1097/MPG.0000000000001883}, author = {Aloi, Marina and Bramuzzo, Matteo and Arrigo, Serena and Romano, Claudio and D{\textquoteright}Arcangelo, Giulia and Lacorte, Doriana and Gatti, Simona and Illiceto, Maria T and Zucconi, Francesca and Dilillo, Dario and Zuin, Giovanna and Knafelz, Daniela and Ravelli, Alberto and Cucchiara, Salvatore and Alvisi, Patrizia} } @article {8513, title = {Effect of Early Versus Late Azathioprine Therapy in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis.}, journal = {Inflamm Bowel Dis}, volume = {22}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Jul}, pages = {1647-54}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: We aimed at describing the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) in pediatric ulcerative colitis, comparing the outcomes of early (0-6 months) versus late (6-24 months) initiation of therapy.

METHODS: Children with ulcerative colitis treated with AZA within 24 months of diagnosis were included. Corticosteroid (CS)-free remission and mucosal healing (MH), assessed by endoscopy or fecal calprotectin, at 12 months were the primary outcomes. Patients were also compared for CS-free remission and MH, need for treatment escalation or surgery, number of hospitalizations, and adverse events during a 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS: A total of 121 children entered the study (median age 10.5 {\textpm} 4.0 years, 59\% girls). Seventy-six (63\%) started AZA between 0 and 6 months (early group) and 45 (37\%) started between 6 and 24 months (late group). Seventy-five percent and 53\% of patients in the early and late group, respectively, received CS at the diagnosis (P = 0.01). CS-free remission at 1 year was achieved by 30 (50\%) of the early and 23 (57\%) of the late patients (P = 0.54). MH occurred in 37 (37\%) patients at 1 year, with no difference between the 2 groups (33\% early, 42\% late; P = 0.56). No difference was found for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of AZA within 6 months of diagnosis seems not more effective than later treatment to achieve CS-free remission in pediatric ulcerative colitis. MH does not depend on the timing of AZA initiation; however, because of the incomplete comparability of the 2 groups at the diagnosis and the use of fecal calprotectin as a surrogate marker of MH, our results should be further confirmed by prospective studies.

}, issn = {1536-4844}, doi = {10.1097/MIB.0000000000000828}, author = {Aloi, Marina and D'Arcangelo, Giulia and Bramuzzo, Matteo and Gasparetto, Marco and Martinelli, Massimo and Alvisi, Patrizia and Illiceto, Maria Teresa and Valenti, Simona and Distante, Manuela and Pellegrino, Salvatore and Gatti, Simona and Arrigo, Serena and Civitelli, Fortunata and Martelossi, Stefano} } @article {7697, title = {Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in giant cell hepatitis with autoimmune hemolytic anemia: A multicenter study.}, journal = {Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jun 29}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Giant cell hepatitis with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (GCH-AHA) is a rare disease of infancy, of possible autoimmune mechanism with poor prognosis due to its scarce response to immunosuppressive drugs. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment in inducing and maintaining remission of the liver disease, in patients with GCH-AHA.

METHODS: Seven children with GCH-AHA, four newly diagnosed, and three in relapse, being treated with different therapies, received one to three IVIg infusions (0.5 to 2g/kg) in association with other immunosuppressive drugs. Subsequently five of them received monthly sequential IVIg infusions (mean 13.4, range 7-24).

RESULTS: IVIg infusions as first-line therapy associated with prednisone and other immunosuppressive drugs significantly (P=0.04) reduced the aminotransferase activity in all patients and normalized prothombin activity in the only patient with severe liver dysfunction. Sequential monthly IVIg infusions determined a steroid-sparing effect and allowed a complete or partial remission in all patients, although with temporary efficacy, since relapse of the hemolytic anemia and/or of liver disease occurred in all patients. IVIg infusions were associated with mild side effects in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS: IVIg infusion can be safely and effectively administered in patients with severe GCH-AHA at diagnosis, or in case of relapse, in association with other immunosuppressive drugs. Repeated IVIg infusions may help maintain remission, however, due to their temporary efficacy, they should not be routinely employed.

}, issn = {2210-741X}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinre.2015.03.009}, author = {Marsalli, Giulia and Nastasio, Silvia and Sciveres, Marco and Calvo, Pier Luigi and Ramenghi, Ugo and Gatti, Simona and Albano, Veronica and Lega, Sara and Ventura, Alessandro and Maggiore, Giuseppe} }