@article {10585, title = {Guidelines of the Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy for the minimally invasive treatment of the esophageal atresia.}, journal = {Pediatr Med Chir}, volume = {39}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 04}, pages = {166}, abstract = {

Not available.

}, keywords = {Esophageal Atresia, Humans, Infant, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Video-Assisted Surgery}, issn = {2420-7748}, doi = {10.4081/pmc.2017.166}, author = {Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio and Conighi, Maria Luisa and Conforti, Andrea and Esposito, Ciro and Escolino, Maria and Beretta, Fabio and Cheli, Maurizio and Di Benedetto, Vincenzo and Scuderi, Maria Grazia and Casadio, Giovanni and Marzaro, Maurizio and Fascetti, Leon Francesco and Vella, Claudio and Bleve, Cosimo and Codric, Daniela and Caione, Paolo and Bagolan, Pietro} } @article {10586, title = {Guidelines of the Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy for the minimally invasive treatment of the ureteropelvic-junction obstruction.}, journal = {Pediatr Med Chir}, volume = {39}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 04}, pages = {174}, abstract = {

Not available.

}, keywords = {Humans, Infant, Kidney Pelvis, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Ureteral Obstruction, Video-Assisted Surgery}, issn = {2420-7748}, doi = {10.4081/pmc.2017.174}, author = {Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio and Bleve, Cosimo and Esposito, Ciro and Escolino, Maria and Beretta, Fabio and Cheli, Maurizio and Di Benedetto, Vincenzo and Scuderi, Maria Grazia and Casadio, Giovanni and Marzaro, Maurizio and Fascetti, Leon Francesco and Bagolan, Pietro and Vella, Claudio and Conighi, Maria Luisa and Codric, Daniela and Nappo, Simona and Caione, Paolo} } @article {10569, title = {Pediatric Ovarian Torsion and its Recurrence: A Multicenter Study.}, journal = {J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol}, volume = {30}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jun}, pages = {413-417}, abstract = {

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report results of a retrospective multicentric Italian survey concerning the management of pediatric ovarian torsion (OT) and its recurrence.

DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Italian Units of Pediatric Surgery.

PARTICIPANTS: Participants were female aged 1-14~years of age with surgically diagnosed OT between 2004 and~2014.

INTERVENTIONS: Adnexal detorsion, adnexectomy, mass excision using laparoscopy or laparotomy. Different kinds of oophoropexy (OPY) for OT or recurrence, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A total of 124 questionnaires were returned and analyzed to understand the current management of pediatric OT and its recurrence. The questionnaires concerned patient age, presence of menarche, OT site, presence and type of mass, performed procedure, OPY technique adopted, intra- and postoperative complications, recurrence and site, procedure performed for recurrence, OPY technique for recurrence, and 1~year follow-up of detorsed ovaries.

RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 9.79~{\textpm}~3.54~years. Performed procedures were open adnexectomy (52 of 125; 41.6\%), laparoscopic adnexectomy~(25 of 125; 20\%), open detorsion (10 of 125; 8\%), and laparoscopic detorsion (38 of 125; 30.4\%). Recurrence occurred in 15 of 125 cases (12\%) and resulted as~significant (P~=~.012) if associated with a normal ovary at the first episode of torsion. Recurrence occurred only in 1 of 19 cases after OPY (5.2\%). Ultrasonographic results of detorsed ovaries were not significant whether an OPY was performed or not (P~=~1.00).

CONCLUSION: Unfortunately, oophorectomy and open technique are still widely adopted even if not advised. Recurrence is not rare and the risk is greater in patients without ovarian masses. OPY does not adversely affect ultrasonographic results at 1~year. When possible OPY should be performed at the first episode of OT.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Italy, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Menarche, Ovarian Diseases, Ovariectomy, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Torsion Abnormality}, issn = {1873-4332}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpag.2016.11.008}, author = {Bertozzi, Mirko and Esposito, Ciro and Vella, Claudio and Briganti, Vito and Zampieri, Nicola and Codrich, Daniela and Ubertazzi, Michele and Trucchi, Alessandro and Magrini, Elisa and Battaglia, Sonia and Bini, Vittorio and Conighi, Maria Luisa and Gulia, Caterina and Farina, Alessandra and Camoglio, Francesco Saverio and Rigamonti, Waifro and Gamba, Piergiorgio and Riccipetitoni, Giovanna and Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio and Inserra, Alessandro and Appignani, Antonino} } @article {10458, title = {Preputial reconstruction in hypospadias repair.}, journal = {J Pediatr Urol}, volume = {13}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Feb}, pages = {102-109}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: In principle, the prepuce can be reconstructed during hypospadias repair, but the procedure has not gained wide acceptance and preputial reconstruction (PR) is surrounded by several controversies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review is provided of the technique for PR, how PR combines with the other steps of hypospadias repair, the risks of complications related to the urethroplasty and specific to PR, and the results of PR with particular regard to the relevance for the patient and his family.

RESULTS: PR can be important for patients requiring hypospadias repair and their parents. It can be performed in almost all patients with distal hypospadias except perhaps those with the most asymmetrical prepuces or severe ventral skin deficiency. PR does not seem to increase urethroplasty complications, but combination of PR with tubularisation of the urethral plate urethroplasty seems to offer the best chance of success. Specific complications occur in around 8\% of patients and include partial or complete dehiscence of the prepuce and secondary phimosis. To prevent the latter, the reconstructed prepuce should be easily retractile at the end of surgery. Technical modifications can help to achieve this goal. Cosmetically, reconstructed prepuces are not fully normal, but the abnormality could be less important for a patient and his parents that the complete absence of the prepuce.

CONCLUSION: On the basis of the evidence summarised above, an algorithm for PR in patients with distal hypospadias is proposed. PR can be offered to the vast majority of distal hypospadias patients, although some modification of the technique for hypospadias repair can be required. Retractility of the reconstructed prepuce at the end of surgery seems paramount for final success.

}, issn = {1873-4898}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.07.018}, author = {Castagnetti, Marco and Bagnara, Vincenzo and Rigamonti, Waifro and Cimador, Marcello and Esposito, Ciro} } @article {8479, title = {Does Preputial Reconstruction Increase Complication Rate of Hypospadias Repair? 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.}, journal = {Front Pediatr}, volume = {4}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, pages = {41}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review of the literature on preputial reconstruction (PR) during hypospadias repair to determine the cumulative risk of preputial skin complications and the influence of PR on urethroplasty complications, namely, fistula formation and overall reoperation rate of the repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the literature published after 06/1995 was performed in 06/2015 using the keyword "hypospadias." Only studies on the outcome of PR in children, defined as dehiscence of the reconstructed prepuce or secondary phimosis needing circumcision, were selected. A meta-analysis of studies comparing PR vs. circumcision was performed for the outcomes "hypospadias fistula formation" and "reoperation rate."

RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified. Nineteen reported the outcome of PR in 2115 patients. Overall, 95\% (2016/2115) of patients undergoing PR had distal hypospadias. The cumulative rate of PR complications was 7.7\% (163/2115 patients), including 5.7\% (121/2115 patients) preputial dehiscences and 1.5\% (35/2117 reported patients) secondary phimoses needing circumcision. A meta-analysis of seven studies comparing patients undergoing PR vs. circumcision showed no increased risk of urethral fistula formation associated with PR, odds ratio (OR) (Mantel-Haenszel, Fixed effect, 95\% CI), 1.25 (0.80-1.97). Likewise, two studies comparing the overall reoperation rate did not show an increased risk of reoperation associated with PR, OR (Mantel-Haenszel, Random effect, 95\% CI), 1.27 (0.45-3.58).

CONCLUSION: PR carries an 8\% risk of specific complications (dehiscence of reconstructed prepuce or secondary phimosis needing circumcision), but does not seem to increase the risk of urethroplasty complications, and the overall reoperation rate of hypospadias repair.

}, issn = {2296-2360}, doi = {10.3389/fped.2016.00041}, author = {Castagnetti, Marco and Gnech, Michele and Angelini, Lorenzo and Rigamonti, Waifro and Bagnara, Vincenzo and Esposito, Ciro} }