<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conighi, Maria Luisa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conforti, Andrea</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esposito, Ciro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Escolino, Maria</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beretta, Fabio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheli, Maurizio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Di Benedetto, Vincenzo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scuderi, Maria Grazia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Casadio, Giovanni</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marzaro, Maurizio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fascetti, Leon Francesco</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vella, Claudio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bleve, Cosimo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Codric, Daniela</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caione, Paolo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bagolan, Pietro</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guidelines of the Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy for the minimally invasive treatment of the esophageal atresia.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatr Med Chir</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatr Med Chir</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esophageal Atresia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Video-Assisted Surgery</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017 Oct 04</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">166</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Not available.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29034656?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bleve, Cosimo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esposito, Ciro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Escolino, Maria</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beretta, Fabio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheli, Maurizio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Di Benedetto, Vincenzo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scuderi, Maria Grazia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Casadio, Giovanni</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marzaro, Maurizio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fascetti, Leon Francesco</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bagolan, Pietro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vella, Claudio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conighi, Maria Luisa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Codric, Daniela</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nappo, Simona</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Caione, Paolo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guidelines of the Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy for the minimally invasive treatment of the ureteropelvic-junction obstruction.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatr Med Chir</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatr Med Chir</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kidney Pelvis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ureteral Obstruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Video-Assisted Surgery</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017 Oct 04</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">174</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Not available.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29034657?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bertozzi, Mirko</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esposito, Ciro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vella, Claudio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Briganti, Vito</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zampieri, Nicola</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Codrich, Daniela</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ubertazzi, Michele</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trucchi, Alessandro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magrini, Elisa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Battaglia, Sonia</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bini, Vittorio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conighi, Maria Luisa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gulia, Caterina</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farina, Alessandra</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Camoglio, Francesco Saverio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rigamonti, Waifro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gamba, Piergiorgio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Riccipetitoni, Giovanna</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chiarenza, Salvatore Fabio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inserra, Alessandro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Appignani, Antonino</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pediatric Ovarian Torsion and its Recurrence: A Multicenter Study.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adolescent</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Child</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Child, Preschool</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cohort Studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Infant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Italy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laparoscopy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laparotomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Menarche</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ovarian Diseases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ovariectomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Postoperative Complications</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Recurrence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Retrospective Studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Surveys and Questionnaires</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torsion Abnormality</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017 Jun</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">413-417</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;STUDY OBJECTIVE: &lt;/b&gt;To report results of a retrospective multicentric Italian survey concerning the management of pediatric ovarian torsion (OT) and its recurrence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;DESIGN: &lt;/b&gt;Multicenter retrospective cohort study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;SETTING: &lt;/b&gt;Italian Units of Pediatric Surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;PARTICIPANTS: &lt;/b&gt;Participants were female aged 1-14 years of age with surgically diagnosed OT between 2004 and 2014.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;INTERVENTIONS: &lt;/b&gt;Adnexal detorsion, adnexectomy, mass excision using laparoscopy or laparotomy. Different kinds of oophoropexy (OPY) for OT or recurrence, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: &lt;/b&gt;A total of 124 questionnaires were returned and analyzed to understand the current management of pediatric OT and its recurrence. The questionnaires concerned patient age, presence of menarche, OT site, presence and type of mass, performed procedure, OPY technique adopted, intra- and postoperative complications, recurrence and site, procedure performed for recurrence, OPY technique for recurrence, and 1 year follow-up of detorsed ovaries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;RESULTS: &lt;/b&gt;Mean age at surgery was 9.79 ± 3.54 years. Performed procedures were open adnexectomy (52 of 125; 41.6%), laparoscopic adnexectomy (25 of 125; 20%), open detorsion (10 of 125; 8%), and laparoscopic detorsion (38 of 125; 30.4%). Recurrence occurred in 15 of 125 cases (12%) and resulted as significant (P = .012) if associated with a normal ovary at the first episode of torsion. Recurrence occurred only in 1 of 19 cases after OPY (5.2%). Ultrasonographic results of detorsed ovaries were not significant whether an OPY was performed or not (P = 1.00).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;CONCLUSION: &lt;/b&gt;Unfortunately, oophorectomy and open technique are still widely adopted even if not advised. Recurrence is not rare and the risk is greater in patients without ovarian masses. OPY does not adversely affect ultrasonographic results at 1 year. When possible OPY should be performed at the first episode of OT.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27894860?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Castagnetti, Marco</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bagnara, Vincenzo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rigamonti, Waifro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cimador, Marcello</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esposito, Ciro</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Preputial reconstruction in hypospadias repair.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Pediatr Urol</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Pediatr Urol</style></alt-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017 Feb</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">102-109</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;OBJECTIVE: &lt;/b&gt;In principle, the prepuce can be reconstructed during hypospadias repair, but the procedure has not gained wide acceptance and preputial reconstruction (PR) is surrounded by several controversies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;MATERIAL AND METHODS: &lt;/b&gt;A review is provided of the technique for PR, how PR combines with the other steps of hypospadias repair, the risks of complications related to the urethroplasty and specific to PR, and the results of PR with particular regard to the relevance for the patient and his family.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;RESULTS: &lt;/b&gt;PR can be important for patients requiring hypospadias repair and their parents. It can be performed in almost all patients with distal hypospadias except perhaps those with the most asymmetrical prepuces or severe ventral skin deficiency. PR does not seem to increase urethroplasty complications, but combination of PR with tubularisation of the urethral plate urethroplasty seems to offer the best chance of success. Specific complications occur in around 8% of patients and include partial or complete dehiscence of the prepuce and secondary phimosis. To prevent the latter, the reconstructed prepuce should be easily retractile at the end of surgery. Technical modifications can help to achieve this goal. Cosmetically, reconstructed prepuces are not fully normal, but the abnormality could be less important for a patient and his parents that the complete absence of the prepuce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;CONCLUSION: &lt;/b&gt;On the basis of the evidence summarised above, an algorithm for PR in patients with distal hypospadias is proposed. PR can be offered to the vast majority of distal hypospadias patients, although some modification of the technique for hypospadias repair can be required. Retractility of the reconstructed prepuce at the end of surgery seems paramount for final success.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773620?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Castagnetti, Marco</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gnech, Michele</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Angelini, Lorenzo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rigamonti, Waifro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bagnara, Vincenzo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Esposito, Ciro</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Does Preputial Reconstruction Increase Complication Rate of Hypospadias Repair? 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Front Pediatr</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Front Pediatr</style></alt-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">41</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;INTRODUCTION: &lt;/b&gt;We performed a systematic review of the literature on preputial reconstruction (PR) during hypospadias repair to determine the cumulative risk of preputial skin complications and the influence of PR on urethroplasty complications, namely, fistula formation and overall reoperation rate of the repair.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;MATERIALS AND METHODS: &lt;/b&gt;A systematic search of the literature published after 06/1995 was performed in 06/2015 using the keyword &quot;hypospadias.&quot; Only studies on the outcome of PR in children, defined as dehiscence of the reconstructed prepuce or secondary phimosis needing circumcision, were selected. A meta-analysis of studies comparing PR vs. circumcision was performed for the outcomes &quot;hypospadias fistula formation&quot; and &quot;reoperation rate.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;RESULTS: &lt;/b&gt;Twenty studies were identified. Nineteen reported the outcome of PR in 2115 patients. Overall, 95% (2016/2115) of patients undergoing PR had distal hypospadias. The cumulative rate of PR complications was 7.7% (163/2115 patients), including 5.7% (121/2115 patients) preputial dehiscences and 1.5% (35/2117 reported patients) secondary phimoses needing circumcision. A meta-analysis of seven studies comparing patients undergoing PR vs. circumcision showed no increased risk of urethral fistula formation associated with PR, odds ratio (OR) (Mantel-Haenszel, Fixed effect, 95% CI), 1.25 (0.80-1.97). Likewise, two studies comparing the overall reoperation rate did not show an increased risk of reoperation associated with PR, OR (Mantel-Haenszel, Random effect, 95% CI), 1.27 (0.45-3.58).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;CONCLUSION: &lt;/b&gt;PR carries an 8% risk of specific complications (dehiscence of reconstructed prepuce or secondary phimosis needing circumcision), but does not seem to increase the risk of urethroplasty complications, and the overall reoperation rate of hypospadias repair.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200322?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record></records></xml>